[omginternets]

Firstly, I think people are making a mountain out of a molehill. The article remains comprehensible on the whole. It’s a good article.

What is presumably meant is the following: sarcasm and irony require a lot of skill and nuance to get right, precisely because they can be understood as saying something along with its inverse. More often than not, a sarcastic written comment will divide the audience into people who understood it to say P and those who understood it to say !P. This is especially true when your audience is large, culturally diverse, and (on average) rather literal-minded.

But don’t beat yourself up too hard. It’s a good article by any measure, and even more so for someone who is not a native English speaker.

[Xunjin]

Thank you for being reasonable here. A lot of "feedbacks" saying that person should "avoid personal stuff" in technical articles are more likely showing their taste instead of actually work on how the writer could express better his irony. Which I understood reading the "trivial" not so trivial xD