| > those vacant homes are not necessarily in places people live or want to live Good point, although i would like data to back that claim. For example in France, 200k empty dwellings are in Paris alone: this does not account for vacant industrial/office space which could also be converted to housing. In all cases, *proposing* (without coercion) homeless people a house somewhere does not sound inhumane at all. > there are far more people living in overcrowded housing Good point, too. Although as i said i would like to see data suggesting that the current real estate market (accounting for all vacant units) can't house everyone decently. > There’s a massive housing shortage in the United States and it’s acting like a vacuum, sucking up wealth and diverting it to landowners. To be clear, i'm not saying we should stop building houses entirely. But as long as you allow housing to remain vacant, prices are driven by speculation not by actual supply. I believe we should both rehouse homeless people immediately and keep investing in eco-friendly collective, affordable housing. |
Source? A quick search only turns a figure half of that: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1290578/number-homes-par...
Also, just because it's "vacant" doesn't mean it can actually be used to house homeless people. It could be undergoing renovations, or on the rental market.