[Brybry]

> What sharply distinguishes the abortion right from the rights recognized in the cases on which Roe and Casey rely is something that both those decisions acknowledged: Abortion destroys what those decisions call “potential life” and what the law at issue in this case regards as the life of an “unborn human being.”

How is that not saying that because abortion specifically involves a few cells then the right to an abortion is not the same as other privacy rights?

Yes, elsewhere they make other arguments about tradition with regards to abortion not being a privacy right. They don't use a singular argument.