|
|
|
|
|
by zebracanevra
1508 days ago
|
|
Yes, very true. I think sometimes you may have to do extra work like calculating hashes, but that can likely be taken from the B2 response if it's compatible with R2 or calculated beforehand. Couple that with the low latency KV and it all shouldn't be too hard to get going! On that note, I hope the overall latency of R2 isn't too bad. I assume it'll all work with CF caching though. B2 was never too good in regard to latency. I wonder... would the TOS allow storing a huge video on B2, proxying it on the fly to R2, redirecting the user to that, then deleting it afterwards? It does say you'd be charged by gb-month stored... |
|