|
|
|
|
|
by yupyup54133
1511 days ago
|
|
Cool but I'd much rather see someone sell a little server box where all I would need to do is plug it into my router and open up a port. IE: If we are going to decentralize with Mastodon-style software lets actually decentralize the hardware used to host the system. |
|
This is something I have thought about for many years. If we have small form factor computers that sell for, say, $5-$25 why not distribute pre-configured, free, open source servers on well-understood hardware^1 instead of having to test on various different hardware possibilities, not all of them well-understood, or making assumptions about what hardware people should have available. IMO, there is value in server configuration. A purchaser could choose to compile and install the software herself but having an example of a working configuration can be invaluable. For me, good examples are usually worth more than countless pages of verbose documentation. The question I have is the dollar amount of that value.
The example I have thought about in the past, rightly or wrongly, is the WRT54G and what became OpenWRT. To me, focusing on one item of hardware initially has advantages. That is generally what vendors of off-the-shelf products do. Yet with open source software, there is usually an expectation that it must work on a variety of hardware, which is likely to make things more complicated.
1. I am not implying this has never been done or that it isn't still happening.