|
|
|
|
|
by caladin
1508 days ago
|
|
I was investigating this lately, and as you say, they are "efforts", and while laudable, I wouldn't go so far as to call them solutions. There are open issues/caveats as a result of the async model. I do think there is something great about being able to continue to leverage existing JDBC-related tooling, given that it already exists. |
|