|
|
|
|
|
by User23
1508 days ago
|
|
Go is not a traditional systems programming language and calling it one is misleading at best and maybe even borderline dishonest. Two big problems are the lack of control of memory layout and the lack of some form that compiles down to a computed goto. It’s just not possible to write performant systems code without those. I’m not bashing Go though. I appreciate the focus on readability among other things. It’s a fine language for the use cases it was actually designed for, like pushing petabytes of ad data to serving clusters all around the world with acceptable latency and reliability. |
|
I guess the Genera, Xerox PARC, ETHZ, Microsoft folks are borderline dishonest.