|
|
|
|
|
by whimsicalism
1514 days ago
|
|
Afaict, and I follow this significantly, we were never going to see significant climate devastation in our life time. With lag, it'll be our children and our children's children. While the developed world has been able to offset emissions (renewable growth, but also just pushing manufacturing to the global south), it still has not been nearly enough to avert the worst impacts. And we also don't know at what point positive feedbacks will become runaway and humans will stop being the primary driver. Things are improving, but not so much that I would be actively optimistic. |
|
Curious your thoughts on just these two observations:
Rapid decrease in Lake Mead (and Powell's) water level: http://mead.uslakes.info/level.asp
Rapid decrease of summer arctic sea ice: https://www.arcticdeathspiral.org/
It's very likely within a decade or two we'll see so little water coming out of Mead that the Hoover dam cannot produce electricity.
We also might see a "blue ocean event" in the same time scale.
Do you not consider these "significant climate devastation"? There are many other examples, but since you "follow this significantly" you probably know about them, but for just these two I'm honestly confused how you can see these as non-issues.