|
|
|
|
|
|
by capguy255
1513 days ago
|
|
|
This stuff has happened before. It will happen again. I assume that you must believe that the violation of the nine person sacred debate club is far worse than any of the substantive consequences from the actual decision, right? Specifically -- are you aware that before the Roe v. Wade decision was released in 1973, that news of the decision leaked to the Washington Post? The idea that this has "never occurred" is absurd when a) it has, b) it literally happened in the case that this will overturn. Are you aware that there was a series of leaks during the Berger court and that everything ended up fine? > Judicial independence, separation of powers If the leak came from within the judiciary, how does this threaten the independence of the court? |
|
|
That's not the same you realize?