|
|
|
|
|
|
by boppo1
1514 days ago
|
|
|
>Even in the limit, where ML sysetems do some non-trivial set of human-like tasks (which we aren't even remotely close to yet, btw) I'm a layman in AI/ML and I've seen this stated a lot by people actually programming ML stuff (as opposed to "working in the space" as a blogger/manager/marketer etc.) How can I concretely convey this concept to friends & family panicing about AI from crap they read in NYT/Economist/WSJ etc.? 'Some guy on HN who sounded like he knew what he was talking about says that article you read is sensationalist' doesn't pass their 'expertise' test. |
|
|
What are the arguments brought forth by NYT/etc concerning AI? I haven't really looked, but I haven't seen anything from the NYT or mainstream news about the perils of general AI.
I have seen articles about the risk that AI could put people out of jobs, though, and about potential bias and inaccuracies, too.