|
|
|
|
|
by pessimizer
1517 days ago
|
|
> Because for most people privacy on the internet isn't important. This is untrue and the only place I see people claiming it's true (ironically) is here on HN. Privacy is intentionally made as difficult as possible when using anything where control could conceivably be centralized. These services are also made crucial through the elimination of others that are more privacy-respecting. In the case of the internet, this is inevitable because internet business don't have to make a profit, and they destroy the previous businesses that did. I don't meet anyone who doesn't want privacy as the default. It's weird to even have to say that when Snapchat is winning among the generations that get most accused of being comfortable with this corporate and government-imposed lack of privacy. |
|
This is a nuanced view where there are specific privacy features I care about in some circumstances. But I don't really care about the strong privacy against corporates or government that some do.
This view is informed by my migration from being strongly privacy focused in the 1990s and a subsequent careful analysis of actual harm.
Also I'd note that Snapchat is a great example of this. Privacy for things I care about but little from corporate advertising or governments.