|
|
|
|
|
by SemanticStrengh
1517 days ago
|
|
Human young blood perfusions have potent rejuvenating properties.
Is there scientific evidence that eating human flesh/organs would provide additional benefits over raw blood? Spoiler: there are probably many benefits, see e.g the cognitive benefits that give cerebrolysin, not hard to extrapolate from this and there must exists some human only Peptides.
I recall that women's milk has a special unique substance that is neurotrophic, criminally it is not synthetically adjuvenated in cow's milk. Of course I'm not advocating you to eat me but making artificial babies without brains might be not science fiction. It highly relate with the urgent need of being able to replace animal breeding with philosophical zombies. |
|
With a blood transfusion, the "better" qualities of the blood would largely remain as it gets treated like all the other blood in the body. When eating young flesh, it gets the same treatment as any other random piece of meat. It'd need to be vastly superior to something like pork to even be worth considering, and it just isn't.
The real parallel with transfusions would be growing organs for transplant, something that is researched.
Plus, I think "young blood transfusions" are largely snake oil.