[zozbot234]

To put it shortly, the tone is so pointlessly aggressive that it obscures what accurate information the post contains. The information itself is also presented in a haphazard manner, seemingly chosen to maximize the critical intention as opposed to clarifying things for the reader. Some info that would be potentially valuable to the reader is simply not there, purely because it doesn't fit the "bad Golang!" overall emphasis of this post. E.g. what about pointing at newer novice-friendly prototyping languages with a better FFI story than Go? There's quite a few of them: Nim, Crystal, the new language Hare etc. But you won't find any serious mention of them here, or any comparison of their benefits and drawbacks.