|
|
|
|
|
by lobster_johnson
5365 days ago
|
|
Strange that you find the state of Danish apartments to be sur-par. My experience has been the opposite. I am interested to hear what your criteria are. Fire regulations, plumbing regulations and so on are very strict, so internally you shouldn't really find any qualitative difference between Scandinavia and "other first-world countries". In Scandinavia we have a strong affection for historic buildings, an affection that extends to interiors. We like fireplaces, creaky hardwood floors, crown mouldings, exposed brick walls, that sort of thing. So buildings might feel distinctly unmodern, even though they aren't really. Some facilities may be lacking. Elevators are only common in somewhat newer (post-1980) buildings, for example. Common laundry rooms are usually pretty awful. And I have never come across a Scandinavian apartment building that has a porter. But these are not important things. So again, based on what criteria are you judging Copenhagen? |
|
This a typical mid/low end first-world bathroom: http://www.apollo-plus.co.uk/Design/Leigh.jpg
This isn't: http://images.travelpod.com/users/skylarking/1.1230340500.ds...
Edit: According to http://www.airbnb.com/rooms/111335, this "cute" style has its own name and history:
the type of bathroom typically referred to as a "Copenhagen bathroom". It basically means, that in the "old days", none of the working-class-apartments had showers. Eventually, this changed, but many of the apartments were so small, that it was almost impossible to fit in a big, modern bathroom. However, you get used to it very quickly and it is quite charming in its own way :)
Um, no, I'd rather not have to get used to it.