|
|
|
|
|
by toomuchtodo
1516 days ago
|
|
In which case, you violate nation state laws against KYC and AML, and the repercussions that go along with that. Having the ability to implement a solution technically does not make it legal or without consequence (like Virgil Griffith, formerly of the Ethereum Foundation, who demonstrated to North Korea how to evade sanctions trading Ethereum and is going to jail for five years for doing so). |
|
No, actually. Many people send crypto transactions all the time, and do so anonymously, and the vast majority of them don't get in trouble for it.
Descriptively, it is untrue that there is some sort of wide scale crack down on anonymous crypto transactions in the west.
And no, before you say it, it doesn't really matter if, hypothetically, a future government could become extremely authoritarian, and arrest all the crypto users, because for whatever reason, crypto has been around for a decade, and governments aren't doing that.
The reality, and facts on the ground, are that people making anonymous crypto transactions all the time, and don't get in trouble with that, no matter how much people will then respond to this post by saying "Well, what if the government started doing it tomorrow!". Its not happening. Therefore, it is a useful usecase.