|
|
|
|
|
by formerly_proven
1513 days ago
|
|
> Re: the figure for terrestrial fiber service, I'm curious how the presumed residential last mile "fiber" link in Geoff's example which is not real gigabit service would compare to one of the symmetric gigabit last mile operators that exist in some cities. Where you can see actual 980 x 980Mbps speed test results from fast.com or speedtest.net in a browser. Well if you pay for gigabit over GPON it means you have at worst a 2:1 split, which gives you 1.2/1.2 Gbps. Even assuming they're still using an MPoA/ATM transfer layer like they did on DSL (keep in mind, these are ITU standards - GPON is not Ethernet - though there are fiber networks which are Ethernet, these are AONs by definition (no splitters possible), and use 1000BASE-BX10), that doesn't have nearly enough overhead to reduce 1.2 Gbps to below 1 Gbps. |
|
Not sure what you mean by at worst a 1:2 split since GPON last mile can be implemented at the physical fiber level as many possible configurations such as a 8:1, 16:1, 32:1 split. Your ISP isn't likely to tell you or share with you the optical link budget and split of your segment.