[javajosh]

"Ultraviolet Catastrophe"'s problem is that it sounds way cooler than it is. I mean, that's the title of a cyberpunk novel; more hyperbolic (and disappointing) than pretentious. Eigenthings would be second on my list of pretentiousness (oddly, not gedankenthings; I'm inconsistent I guess). Standard Model names strike me whimsical to the point of being undignified.

[ravi-delia]

I'm still mad about top and bottom when truth and beauty were right there!

[lvncelot]

If I'm not mistaken, the "official" names are just "t" and "b", so top and bottom, just like truth and beauty, are more mnemonics. So referring to them as truth and beauty would be just as correct.

[jleyank]

Thought one was their names and the other their attributes?

[lvncelot]

Seems like you're right and I misremembered.

[dr_dshiv]

Ultraviolet catastrophe is cool! It’s why we needed quantum physics, otherwise there would be catastrophic infinite energy emerging from random high frequency oscillations!

[javajosh]

Well that's not quite what it is, first of all, and second of all I don't like the practice of calling something a catastrophe when its just predicted by a theory, but didn't happen. I mean, bad theories always predict something horrible should be happening. What's next, do flat earthers get to have an "ocean water catastrophe" because their theory implies all the water drains away? Or a "super luminal" catastrophe because their theory requires infinite unending linear acceleration of the earth (and moon and sun)? I mean, it really is a catastrophe I guess...for the theorist.