[klyrs]

> I'm discussing the hypocrisy in advocating for the principle only when it suits you.I'm discussing the hypocrisy in advocating for the principle only when it suits you.

Only, you're the one who has defined "the principle" in your own terms. I prefer to read "the Constitution." The position that I defend is the one backed by the Constitution. You can portray that as flip-flopping every time I go from defending a company's right to curate content that it broadcasts to attacking government attempts to enforce religious beliefs through censorship and legislative retaliation to speech, but my position is unwavering.