|
|
|
|
|
|
by john_moscow
1513 days ago
|
|
|
This can be equally well explained by both software changes and the usual patterns of the public attention. When any kind of high-impact news breaks out, it immediately sparks peak interest lasting a few days, and then exponentially dropping back to near zero, as the attention becomes split between other topics. It doesn't matter if the original event is still ongoing, it's just how the public attention works. You can see it quite well on Google Trends for any kind of large-impact event (e.g. [0]). The attention to Twitter buyout will follow exactly the same curve. Most people who would ever react to it (by joining or leaving) will do so in the first few days, and then the change numbers will start dropping exponentially. [0] https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=Ukraine%20war |
|
|