[jodrellblank]

> "Even the fact that a particular piece of software is used by a specific IP address is enough PII that it's covered under GDPR by most viewpoints."

I draw your attention to the link I posted, and the purple background call out box with the exclamation mark icon and the heading "Note" which says: "Application Insights uses the hosts IP address to determine the geographic location. The IP address is never included in the telemetry data or stored in the database."

> "I would simply wish for no telemetry to happen at all without user consent."

I would, too. So did someone on Github: https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/issues/15722 "Change telemetry from opt-out to opt-in" where Microsoft said "we felt that by making telemetry opt-in it would bias and limit our telemetry in a way that would make less useful to our users."

[mschuster91]

> The IP address is never included in the telemetry data or stored in the database.

It nevertheless is transferred to the origin server (otherwise, how would TCP work), and that is enough for it to be considered under GDPR!

> we felt that by making telemetry opt-in it would bias and limit our telemetry in a way that would make less useful to our users

Well, that still doesn't override the GDPR. The GDPR is law, precisely in the spirit to prevent un-consented tracking!