|
|
|
|
|
by seandhuine
1520 days ago
|
|
I'm hoping that gradually over a very short period of time folks will realize the contradiction in terms that is called "punctuated equilibrium". It has no feasible molecular basis. Without such, it might as well be fairy dust for its explanatory power. But gradual fairy dust, that operates over very short periods of time. The pertinent question remains: at the molecular level, how? |
|
Species are sent back and forth between those two extremes by changes in the environment brought on by our planet's constantly changing climate, topography and ecosystems. Sometimes, when the isolation ends, the combination of made-permanent recessive traits turns out to be harmful and the isolated population is replaced by the larger one (if the larger one survived), and other times it is helpful and they spread out into the larger environment. It isn't a contradiction any more than first and second gear on your bike are - you can't have them both at once, but they are switched between by systems external to the bike itself (the rider).
The idea is that every species is descendant from a highly inbred population of another species. Curiously, this happens in the Bible (Noah's ark).
The molecular basis is the same as that of Darwinian evolution (transcription errors plus whole-organism natural selection), combined with the usual laws of population genetics.