[sudosysgen]

That is not true. The UK doesn't have the force projection capability to do that to Morocco, which is a US ally. The UK would get hammered in an attempt to terrorise Morocco.

The only remotely conceivable way that the UK would have of projecting significant power onto the Moroccan mainland is by trying to foment a civil war. Otherwise they would not get anything out of it.

If the US even allowed the UK to do such a foolish thing, it would be disastrous long-term for the whole of Europe. Completely alienating and breaking off with North Africa means that Europe is now completely surrounded with unfriendly countries.

[axg11]

This is false. Not that it matters to the wider argument but UK has plenty of power projection capabilities to mount an offensive in Morocco.

Morocco is even within reasonable distance for the UK to run sorties from UK air bases, let alone including aircraft carriers, cruise missile attacks from submarines, etc.

[sudosysgen]

It really isn't. The UK has very little in the way of power projection. Sure they could lob a few bombs and fire a few cruise missiles, that's not going to make the Moroccan government turn on solar power. All it will do is make them and the Moroccan people very, very angry.

If you want to take a country's resources by force, there is no option short of a ground campaign. Without a civil war in Morocco (that the UK couldn't make happen even if they tried), there is no way for them to put boots on the ground. The only way would be to cut a deal with Algeria or Mauritania for a ground invasion (not happening!), or to stage some kind of amphibious landing.

I thought that by now people would have understood that you can't win a war through air power only.