[Tao331]

> there are self-interpretations that seem pretty self-destructive

That's the counter argument to your previous assertion. A self-interpretation is wrong if it destroys the self. By destroying the interpreter (the self), the interpretation becomes an unfalsifiable claim.

[vintermann]

This is just nonsense. You're not wrong for being foolhardy, or for doing something I see as self-destructive. Presumably you have a reason that makes it worth it to you. Everyone is destructed in the end anyway.

[Tao331]

> Everyone is destructed in the end anyway.

Is this true? How do you know?