|
|
|
|
|
by KennyBlanken
1522 days ago
|
|
1) Ad hominem; even if it were an accurate claim, it would also be an irrelevant one. 2) You're broadly dismissing factual statements as "claims" with no supporting evidence. Given the statements on RW are backed extensively by citations, please support "a lot of claims about him are a stretch" with citations of your own. 3) I take it your "hypothetical" example about race and intelligence isn't actually hypothetical but something you actually believe? |
|