[kjrose]

To me this almost seems like an argument to insist on legal level protections for development of contractual code. As in, you need to have qualifications like a lawyer, liability coverage like a lawyer (or bank) and have to be approved in some fashion before you can publish a contract that deals with more than a certain amount of capital.

Theres no difference between a badly codes contract and a badly written one that doesn't do what one signer intended. Short of you can try to convince a judge to adjust it or handle it differently.

In this case. There is no judgment system to allow for reversal of badly coded or misunderstood contracts. Which means that the standard for the development should be far higher with considerably more insurance and coverage for risk.