[XorNot]

The requirement of "subscribe is as easy as unsubscribe" is a metric which you could argue about in court, but would be very hard to game.

i.e. if signup is "email and credit card number" then you're going to be hard pressed to explain why a similar option to cancel does not exist and isn't accessible in as many clicks, with equivalent screen real-estate usage.

[q-big]

> i.e. if signup is "email and credit card number" then you're going to be hard pressed to explain why a similar option to cancel does not exist

So you argue that to cancel a subscription, you should have to provide your credit card number again. If a check on the credit card fails for some obscure reason, you cannot cancel your subscription.

This is what "subscribe is as easy as unsubscribe" also means.

[kaba0]

I mean, that is precisely the court’s job to interpret the law. Your take is just a deliberately twisted one, it wouldn’t stand a chance in a court setting the same way as a willful offense can’t be defined that precisely, yet there is generally no problem with it.

[XorNot]

Sure: but if it fails, then the card is invalid, and the card no longer can be billed. Again - you wouldn't get away with saying "well we couldn't verify the number" as standard practice - you'd just get sued and then punitively fined if it was found to be a lie.