[jlehman]

> An especially admirable thing about the way Garrett has approached this mess is that he's managed, as far as I can tell, to reliably avoid taking the bait on the drama about the project's founder...

Well, your link shows that this statement is false:

> ...But Curtis is more than just a bad reinventor of things. He is also Mencius Moldbug, a prolific pseudo-intellectual influencer of the alt-right. His politics worry me much more than his coding style. And because of my personal dealings with him, I am not sanguine about his ability or that of his followers to separate the two.

It clearly colors his thinking, as he admits, to some degree.

[tptacek]

I encourage people to actually read Garrett's comments, which include repeated admonitions to take Urbit seriously because Yarvin "isn't an idiot"; he believes it's bad on the merits, not by association to Yarvin. If you ask for a litigation of Curtis Yarvin on this thread, you'll get one, and it isn't going to help your project.

[jlehman]

Which part of my response do you read as asking for a litigation?

[dastbe]

If you hadn't cut off the first part of the statement you quoted, it would explain that he's investing effort in criticizing this particular bad reinvention because of the impact Curtis Yarvin has been able to have elsewhere. He admits that it colors his prioritization, not his thinking.