|
|
|
|
|
by lmwnshn
1524 days ago
|
|
> less impactful now with Sql Server 2019 Could I ask what your process is for detecting whether a rewrite rule is still useful in subsequent versions of the DBMS? Do you read the release notes and test things out manually, or do you have an automated A/B test thing going on? Additionally, have you ever had a rewrite rule change from being beneficial to being detrimental after upgrading versions? If so, how did you detect that? Thanks! Edit: Also, what considerations do you have for rewrite rule order? Do you find that it makes a significant difference in practice? |
|
We've never had a rule change from being beneficial to detrimental. For most of them, I don't think that would be possible, because they just involve giving Sql less irrelevant things to chew on. For a few of them, like the manual scalar function inlining, I could see that being possible, so we will just need to keep checking.
For rewrite rule order, I guess we just do the ones that can enable other optimizations first. So far, that has been pretty simple to determine. For example, when we trim joins from inner queries, we first trim their selections (depending on what is actually used in the outer queries).