|
|
|
|
|
by mianos
1524 days ago
|
|
What do you think an example of a site where a new player has come along with a much better looking site than the incumbent and beat them? Not trying to be negative, I just can't think of any and that would be excellent evidence that it does matter. Just bringing up a list of the top 200 web sites and they are the reference gallery of visually terrible sites. |
|
Both types of bank offer similar basic accounts and services. Interest rates and fees also tend to be similar at the moment.
What does separate them is that the established "big names" almost universally have terrible online banking and mobile apps while the newer alternatives tend to focus on these facilities (I think some of them don't even have physical branches) and they have slick, modern UIs aimed squarely at younger generations and the digital native market.
I don't have any hard data to cite but the number of younger people I see using these services suggests they are having some significant success at breaking into even such a heavily regulated and competitive market.