| > especially people less comfortable with the terminal - don't feel confident installing a bunch of 3rd party zsh completions or creating a custom setup are you telling us that your proprietary blackbox that asks my e-mail and sends telemetry data is better than open-source well-documented, widely-used, established tools? > Lots of teams are using Fig to make internal scripts and CLI tools more ergonomic and discoverable. can these completions be used outside of Fig? i guess not, because this doesn’t make you any money? > In my experience, writing custom shell completion scripts is not very much fun yep, because nobody usually writes them, they’re autogenerated by whatever CLI framework you’re using with Fig you write them and yes, writing autocompletions for Fig manually is better than writing Compdef manually but again, nobody usually writes them… |