|
|
|
|
|
by wccrawford
1524 days ago
|
|
Apple even presented that stance in court, but they seem to have rejected it because of the USB C plug rather than the older style. They also didn't buy that it reduced waste since they sell it separately. Personally, it would reduce waste for me. I have a ton of those plugs and cables in many combinations. But I could see how some people might not have it yet. Perhaps Apple should have offered it for free for a couple years if you ask for it, rather than include it by default, and maybe they would have been better off here. Edit: I'm wondering if I misread it. Is it a proprietary plug on the charger end of the cord? If so, that makes a little more sense, though there are generics for it for a while now anyhow. |
|
But that's a bizarre take from the judge as well. Obviously the claim isn't that no charger is needed. It's that you need way fewer chargers than devices, so shipping a charger with every device is indeed just waste.