|
|
|
|
|
by gr33nq
1517 days ago
|
|
Correct - both people in your scenario end up having no student loan debt. But Person A, who paid their $30k loan in full, now has $30k less to spend on a home, a car, savings, etc.
Person B, who did not pay their $30k, now has effectively $30k more in buying power either immediately or spread across what would otherwise have been their repayment timeline. Person A's responsibility for their obligation has set them back $30k, while Person B's lack of responsibility for making payments has put them ahead $30k. Maybe we shouldn't call it a direct punishment, but they're certainly coming out of the scenario worse off than their counterpart. |
|
It's hard for me not to sound flippant when I say this, but -- this is life. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who has the means to pay off their student loans themselves practically won the lottery and they should be thankful they're not totally fucked like those who need the forgiveness.
There's an ugly, underlying impression I get from this discussion that is oddly reminiscent of the "welfare queen" stereotype.