[Clubber]

I would argue that saying, "some people have two mommies," is arguably age appropriate, but adding, "because some women like to have sex with other women," would not be. The teacher in question should have just said, "ok," or something and not tried to bring in a deeper discussion about sexual preferences.

[LordDragonfang]

The problem is that a reasonable reading of the bill bans both the latter and the former, so either the law was incompetently crafted, or it was not intended to serve the distinction you've laid out.

[nullc]

I can't reasonably extract that reading, particularly since the posters "age appropriate" speaks directly to the text of the legislation.

But poorly crafted legislation-- particularly at the state level-- is the norm, not the exception.

[LordDragonfang]

As I pointed out in my other comment, re-read that sentence, it's two separate clauses joined by or. As in, it bans {any discussion of the topics {K-3 OR not "age appropriate"}}.

[nullc]

Fair enough.