Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jeffbee 1516 days ago
It was "optimized" for the aesthetic concerns of RDBMS purists and for ease of implementation of certain other systems, in other words it was optimal for the developers and severely sub-optimal for the users, which is a problem endemic to RDBMS fandom.
1 comments

So it was basically "write optimized", fully normalized, required at least a half dozen joins to get anything out of it?