|
|
|
|
|
by fvdessen
1521 days ago
|
|
> There are two ways for a war to end: One way is for one side or the other to be basically destroyed. And the Russians are not going to be destroyed. So that means one way is for Ukraine to be destroyed. > The other way is some negotiated settlement. If there’s a third way, no one’s ever figured it out. The third way is for the war to be too costly to continue for the agressor. I believe the USA is aiming for that by giving massive aid to Ukraine. I am a bit surprised Chomsky forgot about that one since it’s how the USA usually loses the wars it loses. |
|
As I said in another comment though, making war costly is basically just waging war. Maybe it will become too costly in one month, maybe one year, maybe five. Maybe Russia will lob a couple of tactical nukes in the direction of Ukraine. Maybe China and India or India and Pakistan get into a hot war because Russia is distracted.
Exhaustion is not a precise strategy and it’s not a short-term or even mid-term strategy when one looks at the Soviet-Afghan war or the Vietnam war. Years of death and destruction can hardly be called a strategy.