[tomatowurst]

> no impression that my articles can move fucking Samsung's stock

> I do know that my reports have moved smaller companies stocks by 20% in a single day

seems like a weird contradiction. you really think a disclaimer can protect you here? Like many of us pointed out, you've made quite a bold, unsubstantiated claims with poorly cited evidence. You've admitted that your writing in the past have moved the targeted company's stock.

> If I thought I could move the stock, I'd make the position in the morning alongside my clients

I'm sure you could but writing a piece like this, without substantial evidence, I think could influence investors opinions and you've admitted that your writings in the past have moved stocks negatively.

> There's plenty of evidence though. Be an industry insider and you'd recognize it all.

so where are the evidence that support your claims?

[dylan522p]

If you don't want to believe it. Go ahead. The major claims are true, Qualcomm moving away. Nvidia moving away. DRAM node ramps being pitiful. DRAM engineering efforts come directly from a source there.

The cultural issues being the cause of these issues is the substantial claim.