[madeofpalk]

You're making the exact argument Twitter made for not banning Trump during the first 3.8 years of his presidency. Like literally "Trump is newsworthy" is word-for-word the reason Twitter used for keeping him on.

Then, they thought that they were, or could be, complicit in a violent domestic attack, and made a call.

[sjg007]

Sweet sweet ad revenue.

[tigershark]

They actually were complicit in a failed coup. They are lucky that nobody had the balls to prosecute the organisers of the coup and only the rubes that actually participated are somewhat paying.