|
|
|
|
|
by rrsmtz
1522 days ago
|
|
"We" didn't kill anybody, they died of a highly transmissible and novel disease for which there was no cure and no vaccine for over a year. There was no possible way that death could have been completely averted. Yes, there were policy choices that could have been made differently, that would have potentially slowed the spread. We implemented many, decided not to implement others, and had a difficult time enforcing the policies we did enact. But using the language of murder when talking this, and arguing using an implied base rate of zero, is hardly good faith. |
|
Respectfully, I disagree. If there was no possible way to avert it, how did China avert the vast majority of equivalent deaths?
The action/omission distinction is for judging who started a fight in a schoolyard, not for judging the actions of nation-states.