|
|
|
|
|
by bombcar
1524 days ago
|
|
That shows exactly the point, 10% for maintenance isn't enough, doesn't cover taxes, insurance, and other costs, and netting $200/month on a (assumed) $450k+ house isn't great, that's less than the interest earned on a deposit of the same amount. Even if you only count the downpayment, $2400 a year on $90k is a 2.6% return; you therefore are getting the majority of your return from appreciation. To actually make a profit on the rental portion, you need to discount the appreciation. You can do this if you're paying into a mortgage from 20 years ago and renting at todays prices, but that's just ignoring the fact that you could sell the property. The biggest risk that most small landlords don't account for is a bad tenant - they exist and they will quickly eat through your $200/net a month. The final proof is no company anywhere is building single-family rentals. If there was money to be made there, they would; but you need to get to apartments and the cost-savings inherent in them before it makes sense. |
|
And yes, I’ll agree that some portion of the ROI on a house is the expected appreciation, but we’ve setup a system where that’s effectively guaranteed in many locations and simultaneously unavailable to renters. There’s a reason “be a landlord” is now the go-to “get rich” strategy for a large number of people.