[techdragon]

While some jurisdictions, notably Japan and the US Federal level, are not legally concerned with depictions of underage sex that does not have anything to do with an incident of actual underage sex, other jurisdictions such as the majority of US States at the state level have laws that treat any visual depictions of underage sex as equivalent be they photographs of a real event or artistic depictions of completely imaginary stuff.

So while it’s a fair position to take that banning it is absurd… as a Corporation in US legal jurisdictions such as I believe California, Washington and Delaware, they will have to comply with state law regarding such matters in three separate jurisdictions, easiest way being to completely prevent the objectionable content entirely.

[stavros]

Certainly, I was more talking about the law itself. It seems to me that if there was a flood of fake child porn, the demand for real child porn would plummet.