|
|
|
|
|
by ate53
1535 days ago
|
|
It's a viable strategy. No legitimate implementation produces compression pointers that go anywhere other than backwards. I track the start of a label sequence and whether I've followed a pointer. If I've just followed a pointer, I must be at a point earlier than the last start, or I consider it a malicious name. I also disallow pointers to pointers but I'm less confident that there's not something out there that does that. |
|
Edit: nevermind, I see what you are doing.