Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by giraffe_lady 1530 days ago
Oh, I see how you could read it that way, yes. Here let me refute some of these assumptions:

- I don't assert that opposing these things is a moral necessity for everyone, but do find it so for myself.

- I extend civility usually but not always, it depends on the circumstances. If being uncivil furthers my goals or feels correct then I will do it.

- I don't oppose "republicans" generally but I oppose specific harmful acts, including speech in some instances. "Engagement with" is too broad: I'm willing to (and do!) have coffee and discuss any issue privately, but may vehemently oppose the same conversation happening as a public debate, for example.

- Absolutely not everything is permissible and there are many more lines I won't cross than ones I will.

Just for a concrete example, if you read through my history a little you'll notice I fucking hate the police. What you wouldn't guess is my home AA group is all cops except for me. Many years ago I needed help and didn't realize that's what it was and they helped me and I stayed. None of us hide any part of ourselves there. There are men I have opposed in armed conflict in the street and then met with mutual love and grace in the room.

I see very clearly the humanity of my enemies but nonetheless find I must oppose them. I am rarely truly sure I'm on the right path, but I feel compelled to act and I hope for forgiveness for my mistakes and harms.

1 comments

I misjudged you by the looks of it, so I apologize for that.