[tedivm]

>I agree with you that "purposely misgendering one's colleagues" should lead to firing, but I think this article isn't about that.

I do think the article is about that. I think it was purposefully left vague so he could take advantage of people giving the benefit of the doubt. I don't think people's pronouns should be up for debate, and I believe PG does.

[tlogan]

This is the problem of this “free speech”. They think it is “free speechl to call one “he” even if that one prefers being called “she”.

Anyway, maybe GP is talking about other “heresies”.