[palmdeezy]

> There are a huge number of mostly non-JS-specific problems that monorepo tooling eventually needs to solve: distributed build artifact and test result caching, distributed action execution, sandboxing, resource management and queuing, observability, and integration with other CI tools to name a few.

Turborepo author/founder here....

I agree. I built Turborepo because existing tools weren’t meeting our needs.

To solve these problems and still be flexible, many existing build tools end up with lots of configuration bloat. We’re trying to avoid that. We want to reimagine the developer experience of monorepo tooling and make it accessible for everyone.

[pleasegod123]

Hey. Off topic but would you consider handing Formik and TSDX to a community member? Huge appreciation for turborepo and your work on these other libraries -- they have become key parts of the ecosystem and turborepo could follow.

However, this is all the more reason why it could be super helpful to address the governance issue on those projects. Thanks and sorry for disturbing!

[dfabulich]

Is it possible to integrate Turborepo with general-purpose monorepo build tools? Bazel, in particular?

(Is Bazel designed in a way that make it impossible to do JS monorepos well?)

[lhorie]

Yes, it's possible to use Bazel w/ JS tooling. At Uber we run a 1000+ package monorepo w/ Bazel and Yarn. Someone else mentioned rules_nodejs if you want to go with the popular option that is more or less in line with the Bazel philosophy[0]. We use a project called jazelle[1] that makes some different trade-offs that lets us do some interesting things like not busting the whole world's cache when lockfile changes, and source code generation (including automatic syncing of BUILD files to package.json)

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30959893

[1] https://github.com/uber-web/jazelle

[qbasic_forever]

> Is Bazel designed in a way that make it impossible to do JS monorepos well?

Not impossible, but you really need to go all in with it and follow its conventions and practices. See this for the main docs: https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_nodejs

One thing in particular that doesn't work well in the bazel world is doing your own stuff outside its BUILD.bazel files. If you're used to just npm install and jam some code in your package.json scripts... that doesn't usually work in the bazel world. If you have a lot of logic or tools in your build you'll likely need to go all in and make bazel starlark rules or macros that recreate that logic. Nothing is impossible, but expect to spend time getting up to speed and getting things working the bazel way.

[steven-xu]

> Is it possible to integrate Turborepo with general-purpose monorepo build tools? Bazel, in particular?

It's definitely possible, but I think the practical limitations would make it too complex to reason around and maintain. You'd end up creating two separate and overlapping systems to declare dependency graphs and input sources and manage caching and execution.

I haven't yet seen a case where the two are actually interleaved. Currently at Databricks, we use Bazel to provide the correctness guarantees and interop needed for CI, and we use JS-specific tooling (non-Bazel) locally to meet our performance needs, where the usage profile is different and where we're willing to make correctness tradeoffs.

> (Is Bazel designed in a way that make it impossible to do JS monorepos well?)

There are limitations in Bazel that don't play nicely with modern JS conventions. For example, Bazel's standard sandbox is based on symlink farms, and Node.js and the ecosystem by default follow symlinks[1] to their real locations, effectively breaking sandboxing. A FUSE or custom filesystem (Google's version of Bazel takes advantage of one[2]) would be better but is not as portable. As another example, Bazel's action cache tries to watch or otherwise verify the integrity of every input file to an action, and when node_modules is 100k+ files, this gets expensive and is prone to non-determinism. Bazel does this for correctness, which is noble but results in practical performance problems. You need to do extra work to "trick" Bazel into not reading these 100k+ files each time.

The problems feel solvable to me, but not easily without adding yet more configuration options to Bazel. The influx of new JS-specific tooling is a reset to this, building the minimum viable set of functionality that the JS ecosystem specifically needs, without the burdens of being a general purpose build system.

[1] https://nodejs.org/api/cli.html#--preserve-symlinks [2] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2854146

[palmdeezy]

Turborepo author/founder here....

Yes, it's possible. Databricks currently uses both Turborepo and Bazel together in their monorepo[1]

[1] https://twitter.com/elado/status/1504216742393876483?s=20&t=...