| How many elections have you observed? Do you know where your county's central count (tabulation) is done? What mfg and vendors does your county use? Have you worked an election? Have you attended any canvasing boards and certification meetings? > Any investigation claiming ... Because there never was nor can be Truth? Then why even bother? > The problem with mail-in voting... Preaching to the choir. > ...is impossible to verify the whole process by normal citizens. Correct. But this Truth in no way minimizes the numerous other legitimate concerns with election administration in the USA. > ... nearly half of the US electorate doubted Everyone deserves confidence in our elections. We all have concerns. And democracy is not a team sport. We all lose when elections are not free and fair. I'd be far more sympathetic to your concerns if I had any reason to believe they were sincere. Which you could begin to demonstrate by acknowledging, and perhaps even agreeing with, some of the other concerns. |
As a citizen it's on my government to prove that the electoral process is transparent and fair, not the other way around. I know they are, in Canada, because I can see my vote in the box and I can see the people who will count them, which happen to be my neighbors, and I could also volunteer to count the vote and the parties can send their own people so supervise the counting (and plan to do the next election btw). With all of this I can verify and trust the process. The same can't said with mass mail-in voting.
> Because there never was nor can be Truth? Then why even bother?
Strawman, didn't say that
> Preaching to the choir.
Not an argument
> > ...is impossible to verify the whole process by normal citizens.
> Correct. But this Truth in no way minimizes the numerous other legitimate concerns with election administration in the USA.
I didn't say the other concerns were invalid, or even talked about them.
> Everyone deserves confidence in our elections. We all have concerns. And democracy is not a team sport. We all lose when elections are not free and fair.
Truism.
> I'd be far more sympathetic to your concerns if I had any reason to believe they were sincere.
Not an argument. Also you're on the Internet, you can only judge arguments on their face value.