|
|
|
|
|
by dionidium
1533 days ago
|
|
This isn't true. It basically breaks down like this: * Property crimes are much higher in cities than anywhere else * Violent crime rates are highest in cities, but the difference isn't as stark (though still pretty big) Source: https://twitter.com/RyanRadia/status/1461904766238404611 But even this is too kind to cities, because while the average rate of crime in cities varies a lot from neighborhood to neighborhood and city to city, all the most dangerous places in the country are in cities. There is no rural area with a sustained 60+ per 100k homicide rate, but you'll find that in North St. Louis. Source: https://twitter.com/RyanRadia/status/1510472732089241603 Similarly, when you're in the Tenderloin in San Francisco you are in one of the most dangerous places in the country. There is no rural area that even remotely compares. |
|