|
|
|
|
|
|
by dane-pgp
1531 days ago
|
|
|
> we would need about 24 days worth of storage Couldn't you just burn fossil fuels for those 24 days, and then do atmospheric carbon capture for the other 341? Even if pulling the carbon out of the air takes 10 times as much energy as was released during those 24 days, that could still be achieved over the course of the year, with a reasonable amount of over provisioning. |
|
|
In practice, it's far more efficient to capture right when you burn, as each ton of CO2 capture is many times cheaper then.