[andruc]

You can see for yourself with the provided Pagespeed metrics that the root document was served in around 30ms (corresponding to TTFB).

If you can elaborate on how statically-served HTML would render orders of magnitude faster than server-sider-rendered HTML with a similar response time, I'd love to hear it.

[dmitrygr]

Unless the server runs at negative cycles per second, more cycles means more time taken. Did i miss-math?

[zamadatix]

You've shown a way to add multiples of ~0.0000000003 seconds to the time but haven't explained how the page is going to go from .01 seconds to 1.0 seconds as a result when TTFB is 0.03 seconds.