|
|
|
|
|
by watermelon0
1535 days ago
|
|
Two downsides of GHA that I could find: - you are limited to 2 core / 7 GB instance, whereas CircleCI offers up to 16 cores / 64 GB (for example, building software usually scales proportionately to machine size, and this can in theory be up to 8x faster on CircleCI) - no support for ARM instances |
|
GHA also supports bringing your own self-hosted runners [1][2] where you install their agent, so you could, e.g., use an ARM instance on AWS with tons of cores. It looks like CircleCI offers this as well.
[1]: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/hosting-your-own-runners/...
[2]: https://github.com/actions/runner