|
|
|
|
|
by Spivak
1535 days ago
|
|
This doesn’t really make sense what you described isn’t actually a neutral stance — hell just the framing alone betrays your feelings. You’re already using extremely polarizing vocabulary in your attempt to be neutral. Someone in support of trans men and women being able to compete would take issue with: * “men becoming women” — transitioning doesn’t change your gender, it only aligns your outward appearance to the gender you have always been. * “dominating female sports” — the whole point of the opposing view is specifically that trans women don’t dominate sports. You’ve twisted it in such a way that even accepting the premise of your “neutral” statement is already super political. Here’s a real neutral stance that would be accepted by people on both sides of this particular issue. “I’m not qualified to have an opinion on this matter, the decision is best left to the athletic clubs and people more knowledgeable about the effects of HRT.” |
|
Is that really true? There's a growing body of evidence that "the gender you have always been" doesn't really apply as a general case. For example: detransitioners, autogynephiles, abusive parents attempting to 'trans the gay away' in their kids, and so on.
Of course there are people who also report having felt like their dissonant gender identity for as long as they remember, and will for the rest of their lives. But this is not universal.
Seems there are many reasons why one may decide on transitioning, and not all of them are positive.